Pilot Practice Direction: Panel Composition in the First-Tier Tribunal and the Upper Tribunal (Coronavirus, 19/3/20): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Resource | {{Resource | ||
|Title=Pilot Practice Direction: Panel Composition in the First-Tier Tribunal and the Upper Tribunal | |Title=Pilot Practice Direction: Panel Composition in the First-Tier Tribunal and the Upper Tribunal | ||
|Author=Ryder, Ernest | |Author=Ryder, Ernest | ||
|Organisation=Senior President of Tribunals | |||
|Date=2020/03/19 | |Date=2020/03/19 | ||
|URL=https://www.judiciary.uk/publications/pilot-practice-direction-panel-composition-in-the-first-tier-tribunal-and-the-upper-tribunal/ | |URL=https://www.judiciary.uk/publications/pilot-practice-direction-panel-composition-in-the-first-tier-tribunal-and-the-upper-tribunal/ | ||
Latest revision as of 13:53, 25 May 2023
Coronavirus tribunal composition (non-MH) This PD applies to all appeals and applications within the First-tier and Upper Tribunal, except in mental health cases. For the duration of the pilot period, initially six months: (1) a salaried tribunal judge may decide, having regard to urgency among other matters, may depart from the usual rules on panel composition; (2) in such cases, the tribunal may seek the advice of one or more non-legal members to assist with its decision-making, provided the advice is recorded and disclosed to the parties. Superseded by Amended Pilot Practice Direction: Panel Composition in the First-Tier Tribunal and the Upper Tribunal (Coronavirus, 14/9/20).