Upper Tribunal, 'Consultation paper on access to decisions and reporting in UTAAC' (consultation from 10/5/21 to 1/8/21): Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{Resource |Title=Consultation paper on access to decisions and reporting in UTAAC |Author=Upper Tribunal |Date=2021/05/10 |Date closed=2021/08/01 |URL=https://www.judiciary.u...") |
m (Text replacement - "Author=Upper Tribunal" to "Organisation=Upper Tribunal") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Resource | {{Resource | ||
|Title=Consultation paper on access to decisions and reporting in UTAAC | |Title=Consultation paper on access to decisions and reporting in UTAAC | ||
| | |Organisation=Upper Tribunal | ||
|Date=2021/05/10 | |Date=2021/05/10 | ||
|Date closed=2021/08/01 | |Date closed=2021/08/01 | ||
Latest revision as of 13:28, 25 May 2023
Publishing and reporting UT decisions This consultation sets out the difference between Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) decisions which are unpublished, published (which have a UKUT neutral citation number) and reported (which in addition have an AACR citation); and the rules and customs for precedent within the UT (AAC). There are two questionnaires (one for social security, and one for everybody else) asking about how you access UT (AAC) decisions and your views on the Administrative Appeal Chamber Reports.