Watts v UK 53586/09 (2010) ECHR 793: Difference between revisions

 
Line 2: Line 2:


==External link==
==External link==
Not on Bailii at time of writing
{{#bailii:[2010] ECHR 793}}


[https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-98733 HUDOC website] - judgment
[https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-98733 HUDOC website] - judgment

Latest revision as of 19:41, 6 August 2022

The challenge to a care home closure, based on Articles 2, 3, 8 and 14, was declared inadmissible.

External link

BAILII

HUDOC website - judgment