SS v UK 40356/10 (2011) ECHR 107: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
m (Text replacement - "Summary=''(.*)''" to "Summary=$1")
 
Line 6: Line 6:
|Judicial history first case=R (EM) v SSWP (2009) EWHC 454 (Admin)
|Judicial history first case=R (EM) v SSWP (2009) EWHC 454 (Admin)
|Sentence=Welfare benefits and transferred prisoners
|Sentence=Welfare benefits and transferred prisoners
|Summary=''Questions to the parties: "Insofar as their complaints concern the provisions of the [[Social Security (Persons Serving a Sentence of Imprisonment Detained in Hospital) Regulations 2010]], have the fourth and fifth applicants exhausted domestic remedies? Have the applicants suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of their Convention rights on the ground of their prisoner status and/or their disabilities contrary to [[Article 14]] of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 1 of [[Protocol No 1]]?" ''
|Summary=Questions to the parties: "Insofar as their complaints concern the provisions of the [[Social Security (Persons Serving a Sentence of Imprisonment Detained in Hospital) Regulations 2010]], have the fourth and fifth applicants exhausted domestic remedies? Have the applicants suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of their Convention rights on the ground of their prisoner status and/or their disabilities contrary to [[Article 14]] of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 1 of [[Protocol No 1]]?"  
|Subject=Welfare benefits cases
|Subject=Welfare benefits cases
|News=Yes
|News=Yes
|RSS pubdate=2021/03/11 12:23:55 AM
|RSS pubdate=2021/03/11 12:23:55 AM
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 11:55, 8 October 2021

Welfare benefits and transferred prisoners Questions to the parties: "Insofar as their complaints concern the provisions of the Social Security (Persons Serving a Sentence of Imprisonment Detained in Hospital) Regulations 2010, have the fourth and fifth applicants exhausted domestic remedies? Have the applicants suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of their Convention rights on the ground of their prisoner status and/or their disabilities contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 1 of Protocol No 1?"