Welsh Ministers v PJ (2018) UKSC 66: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
m (Text replacement - "Summary=''(.*)''" to "Summary=$1")
 
Line 8: Line 8:
|Judicial history first case=PJ v A Local Health Board (2015) UKUT 480 (AAC)
|Judicial history first case=PJ v A Local Health Board (2015) UKUT 480 (AAC)
|Sentence=CTO and DOL
|Sentence=CTO and DOL
|Summary=''(1) There is no power to impose conditions in a CTO which have the effect of depriving a patient of his liberty. (2) The patient's situation may be relevant to the tribunal's discharge criteria, and the tribunal may explain the true legal effect of a CTO (for the RC to act on that information), but if a patient is being unlawfully detained then the remedy is either habeas corpus or judicial review.''
|Summary=(1) There is no power to impose conditions in a CTO which have the effect of depriving a patient of his liberty. (2) The patient's situation may be relevant to the tribunal's discharge criteria, and the tribunal may explain the true legal effect of a CTO (for the RC to act on that information), but if a patient is being unlawfully detained then the remedy is either habeas corpus or judicial review.
|External links={{link|https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2018/66.image.pdf|Official press summary|s}}
|External links={{link|https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2018/66.image.pdf|Official press summary|s}}



Latest revision as of 11:55, 8 October 2021

CTO and DOL (1) There is no power to impose conditions in a CTO which have the effect of depriving a patient of his liberty. (2) The patient's situation may be relevant to the tribunal's discharge criteria, and the tribunal may explain the true legal effect of a CTO (for the RC to act on that information), but if a patient is being unlawfully detained then the remedy is either habeas corpus or judicial review.