R (EM) v SSWP (2009) EWHC 454 (Admin): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "Summary=''(.*)''" to "Summary=$1") |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*[[R (EM) v SSWP (2009) EWHC 454 (Admin)]] | *[[R (EM) v SSWP (2009) EWHC 454 (Admin)]] | ||
|Sentence=Welfare benefits and transferred prisoners | |Sentence=Welfare benefits and transferred prisoners | ||
|Summary= | |Summary=The Regulations which deprive of welfare benefits transferred prisoners ([[s47/49]] and [[s45A]] patients until they would be entitled to release if in prison) are lawful; this is because there is enough of a relevant difference between them and civil/s37 patients to justify different treatment (i.e. they have been sentenced to a term of imprisonment to which they remain subject); in general, this applies all determinate and indeterminate sentence prisoners, including post-tariff lifers, [[technical lifer]]s being the only exception because they had not been considered when the Regulations were drawn up and there is not enough of a relevant difference present. | ||
|Detail===Related legislation== | |Detail===Related legislation== | ||
*[[Social Security (Hospital In-Patients) Regulations 2005]] | *[[Social Security (Hospital In-Patients) Regulations 2005]] |
Latest revision as of 11:54, 8 October 2021
Welfare benefits and transferred prisoners The Regulations which deprive of welfare benefits transferred prisoners (s47/49 and s45A patients until they would be entitled to release if in prison) are lawful; this is because there is enough of a relevant difference between them and civil/s37 patients to justify different treatment (i.e. they have been sentenced to a term of imprisonment to which they remain subject); in general, this applies all determinate and indeterminate sentence prisoners, including post-tariff lifers, technical lifers being the only exception because they had not been considered when the Regulations were drawn up and there is not enough of a relevant difference present.
Related legislation
External links
- Daily Telegraph, 'Serial killers entitled to benefits, minister admits' (19/7/11). This tabloid-style article complains about the ability of hospital order patients to receive welfare benefits.
Full judgment: BAILII
Download here
Subject(s):
- Welfare benefits cases🔍
Date: 13/3/09🔍
Court: High Court (Administrative Court)🔍
Judicial history:
Judge(s):
- Burnett🔍
Parties:
Citation number(s):
What links here:- Social Security (Hospital In-Patients) Regulations 2005
- R (D and M) v SSWP [2010] EWCA Civ 18
- Welfare benefits
- SS v UK 40356/10 54466/10 [2015] ECHR 520
- SS v UK 40356/10 [2011] ECHR 107
Published: 13/3/09 12:23
Cached: 2025-06-23 16:59:16
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: