Re FL; HN v FL and Hampshire CC (2011) EWHC 2894 (COP): Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "{{thanks|James Batey" to "{{thanks|Batey,James") |
m (Text replacement - "{{thanks\|([A-Za-z]+),([A-Za-z]+)\|" to "{{thanks|$1, $2|") |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Thanks== | ==Thanks== | ||
{{thanks|Batey,James|Court of Protection|providing transcript}} | {{thanks|Batey, James|Court of Protection|providing transcript}} | ||
==External links== | ==External links== |
Latest revision as of 23:34, 29 May 2021
'The primary issues requiring determination by the court were as follows: (1) FL’s capacity to make personal welfare decisions; (2) FL’s mental health needs; (3) FL’s medication; (4) The Z Home’s ability to meet FL’s physical and mental health needs; (5) Whether HN had conducted herself inappropriately or whether such conduct was justified; (6) Whether HCC and or The Z Home conducted themselves inappropriately or whether such conduct was justified; (7) Depending on the outcome of (5) and (6) whether restrictive orders should be made.' 'IPL were permitted to publish details about the case subject to the restrictions in that order.'
Other
Hearing: 27th to 30th September 2011
Before: DJ Ralton
The Applicant appeared in person
Ms Scott Counsel for the First Respondent (on 30th September 2011 only)
Ms Butler-Cole Counsel for the Second Respondent
Thanks
Thanks to James Batey (Court of Protection) for providing transcript.