Re MW; LB Hammersmith and Fulham v MW (2012) MHLO 82 (COP): Difference between revisions
(→Thanks) |
m (Text replacement - "|providing the judgment}}" to "}}") |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==Thanks== | ==Thanks== | ||
{{thanks|Carter,Oliver|Irwin Mitchell Solicitors | {{thanks|Carter,Oliver|Irwin Mitchell Solicitors}} | ||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
Revision as of 21:25, 29 May 2021
(1) MW lacked capacity to make decisions in relation to contact with his childhood friend JC. (2) It was not in MW's best interests for JC to visit MW's home, so an order was granted restraining JC from doing so; this was endorsed with a penal notice because of previous breaches of an injunction. (3) The local authority and Official Solicitor's requested that MW, who lacked litigation capacity, should not attend the hearing because this would be stressful and not conducive to the maintenance of his good mental health: the court acceded to this application. (4) Sensitive evidence was withheld from JC, at the request of the local authority and Official Solicitor, but the court came to its final decision based on the open evidence.
Other
Date: 29/7/12
Before: Horowitz QC
Miss Kirby (instructed by the Local Authority) appeared for the Applicant
Mr Chisholm (instructed by Irwin Mitchell) appeared for the First Respondent
The Second Respondent appeared in person.
Citations
Case no 11620762
Thanks
Thanks to Oliver Carter (Irwin Mitchell Solicitors) for providing the judgment.
External link
No Bailii link (neutral citation is unknown or not applicable)