Re S; D v R (the deputy of S) (2010) EWHC 3748 (COP): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "{{thanks|Alex Ruck Keene" to "{{thanks|Ruck Keene, Alex") |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Thanks== | ==Thanks== | ||
{{thanks| | {{thanks|Ruck Keene, Alex|39 Essex Chambers}} | ||
==External links== | ==External links== |
Latest revision as of 20:53, 29 May 2021
Costs judgment in Court of Protection: (1) up to the December 2009 hearing, because the proceedings had been necessary, the normal rule that costs were to be paid by S's estate was to apply, but (2) from that point onwards, because of her conduct of proceedings, Mrs D was to bear her own costs, plus 75% of the Deputy's costs on the standard (not indemnity) basis.
Related judgments
Sharma v Hunters [2011] EWHC 2546 (COP)
Thanks
Thanks to Alex Ruck Keene (39 Essex Chambers) for providing the judgment.
External links
Possible Bailii link (not there when checked last night, but might have appeared since)
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: