Welsh Ministers v PJ (2018) UKSC 66: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "PJ v A Local Health Board (2015) UKUT 480 (AAC), (2015) MHLO 63" to "PJ v A Local Health Board (2015) UKUT 480 (AAC)") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|Parties=Welsh Ministers, PJ | |Parties=Welsh Ministers, PJ | ||
|Judicial history first case=PJ v A Local Health Board (2015) UKUT 480 (AAC) | |Judicial history first case=PJ v A Local Health Board (2015) UKUT 480 (AAC) | ||
|Sentence=CTO and DOL | |||
|Summary=''(1) There is no power to impose conditions in a CTO which have the effect of depriving a patient of his liberty. (2) The patient's situation may be relevant to the tribunal's discharge criteria, and the tribunal may explain the true legal effect of a CTO (for the RC to act on that information), but if a patient is being unlawfully detained then the remedy is either habeas corpus or judicial review.'' | |Summary=''(1) There is no power to impose conditions in a CTO which have the effect of depriving a patient of his liberty. (2) The patient's situation may be relevant to the tribunal's discharge criteria, and the tribunal may explain the true legal effect of a CTO (for the RC to act on that information), but if a patient is being unlawfully detained then the remedy is either habeas corpus or judicial review.'' | ||
|External links={{link|https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2018/66.image.pdf|Official press summary|s}} | |External links={{link|https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2018/66.image.pdf|Official press summary|s}} | ||
Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
*[https://www.supremecourt.uk/watch/uksc-2018-0037/221018-pm.html Watch hearing: 22/10/18 afternoon session] | *[https://www.supremecourt.uk/watch/uksc-2018-0037/221018-pm.html Watch hearing: 22/10/18 afternoon session] | ||
*[https://www.supremecourt.uk/watch/uksc-2018-0037/judgment.html Watch judgment summary 17/12/18] | *[https://www.supremecourt.uk/watch/uksc-2018-0037/judgment.html Watch judgment summary 17/12/18] | ||
|Subject=Deprivation of liberty, | |Subject=Deprivation of liberty,CTO cases | ||
|News=No | |News=No | ||
|RSS pubdate=2019/ | |RSS pubdate=2019/02/25 10:43:27 PM | ||
}} | }} | ||
[[Category:Brief summary]] | [[Category:Brief summary]] | ||
[[Category:Transcript]] | [[Category:Transcript]] |
Revision as of 21:24, 2 May 2021
CTO and DOL (1) There is no power to impose conditions in a CTO which have the effect of depriving a patient of his liberty. (2) The patient's situation may be relevant to the tribunal's discharge criteria, and the tribunal may explain the true legal effect of a CTO (for the RC to act on that information), but if a patient is being unlawfully detained then the remedy is either habeas corpus or judicial review.
Essex search
This case's neutral citation number appears in the following newsletters:- 39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 91, February 2019)
- 39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 96, July 2019)
External links
Full judgment: BAILII
Subject(s):
Date: 17 December 2018🔍
Court: Supreme Court🔍
Judicial history:
MM case:
- SSJ v MM [2018] UKSC 60
- SSJ v MM; Welsh Ministers v PJ [2017] EWCA Civ 194 (joint judgment)
- MM v WL Clinic [2016] UKUT 37 (AAC) (permission to appeal refused)
- MM v WL Clinic [2015] UKUT 644 (AAC)
PJ case:
Judge(s):
Parties:
Citation number(s):
What links here:- Community Treatment Order
- PJ v A Local Health Board [2015] UKUT 480 (AAC)
- MM v WL Clinic [2015] UKUT 644 (AAC)
- MM v WL Clinic [2016] UKUT 37 (AAC)
- SSJ v MM; Welsh Ministers v PJ [2017] EWCA Civ 194
- SSJ v MM [2018] UKSC 60
- Jonathan Wilson, 'Mental health: update' (Legal Action, February 2019)
- Interface between MHA and MCA
- DSA:MHA - CTOs - Case law
Published: 17/12/18 14:40
Cached: 2025-07-06 14:35:18
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: