R (CS) v MHRT (2004) EWHC 2958 (Admin): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|Sentence=Long s17 leave | |Sentence=Long s17 leave | ||
|Summary=''Unsuccessful challenge to Tribunal's decision not to discharge patient who was on long-term section 17 leave.'' | |Summary=''Unsuccessful challenge to Tribunal's decision not to discharge patient who was on long-term section 17 leave.'' | ||
|Subject= | |Subject=Section 17 leave cases | ||
|News=No | |News=No | ||
|RSS pubdate=2021/04/07 07:39:39 PM | |RSS pubdate=2021/04/07 07:39:39 PM | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 21:20, 2 May 2021
Long s17 leave Unsuccessful challenge to Tribunal's decision not to discharge patient who was on long-term section 17 leave.
Full judgment: BAILII
Subject(s):
- Section 17 leave cases🔍
Date: 6 December 2004🔍
Court: High Court (Administrative Court)🔍
Cites:
Cited by:
- DB v Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board [2021] UKUT 53 (AAC)
- KL v Somerset Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2011] UKUT 233 (AAC)
Judge(s):
- Pitchford🔍
Parties:
Citation number(s):
What links here:- Mental health caselaw archive
- Leave of absence
- R (DR) v Mersey Care NHS Trust [2002] EWHC 1810 (Admin)
- KL v Somerset Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2011] UKUT 233 (AAC)
- DB v Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board [2021] UKUT 53 (AAC)
- Jonathan Wilson, 'Mental health case law: update' (Legal Action, May 2022)
Published: 15/4/06 19:34
Cached: 2025-08-07 16:52:59
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: