DN v Switzerland 27154/95 (2001) ECHR 235: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "\[http:\/\/www\.bailii\.org\/.*\/cases\/(UKSC|ECHR|UKPC|EWCOP|EWFC|UKHL|PBRA)\/(.*)\/(.*)\.html Bailii\]" to "{{#bailii:[$2] $1 $3}}") |
m (Text replacement - "Category:Bias" to "Category:Bias cases") |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[Category:Bias]] | [[Category:Bias cases]] | ||
[[Category:ECHR]] | [[Category:ECHR]] | ||
[[Category:Brief summary]] | [[Category:Brief summary]] | ||
[[Category:Transcript]] | [[Category:Transcript]] | ||
[[Category:2001 cases]] | [[Category:2001 cases]] | ||
Latest revision as of 21:05, 2 May 2021
The psychiatrist who sat as judge rapporteur on the Administrative Appeals Commission had, before the hearing, concluded that the patient should not be released; the patient had legitimate fears that the doctor had a preconceived opinion and was not acting impartially; this was reinforced because he was sole the psychiatric expert and the only person who had interviewed her; Article 5(4) having been breached, damages and costs were awarded
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: