Neary v LB Hillingdon (2013) MHLO 87 (SEC): Difference between revisions

 
Line 16: Line 16:
[http://markneary1dotcom1.wordpress.com/2013/08/09/the-tribunal/ Mark Neary, 'The Tribunal' (Love, Belief and Balls Blog, 9/8/13)]†
[http://markneary1dotcom1.wordpress.com/2013/08/09/the-tribunal/ Mark Neary, 'The Tribunal' (Love, Belief and Balls Blog, 9/8/13)]†


[[Category:Miscellaneous]]
[[Category:Miscellaneous cases]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2013 cases]]
[[Category:2013 cases]]
[[Category:Judgment available on MHLO]]
[[Category:Judgment available on MHLO]]

Latest revision as of 08:22, 2 May 2021

Mark Neary's appeal against Hillingdon's decision to end Housing Benefit was unsuccessful: as he was estranged from his wife, who lived separately in a jointly-owned property, his share of the property counted towards the statutory limit for Housing Benefit purposes.

Related judgments

Neary v LB Hillingdon [2013] MHLO 87 (SEC)

Re Steven Neary; LB Hillingdon v Steven Neary [2012] MHLO 71 (COP)

External links

No Bailii link (neutral citation is unknown or not applicable)

Transcript

Mark Neary, 'The Tribunal' (Love, Belief and Balls Blog, 9/8/13)