R (Compton) v GMC (2008) EWHC 2868 (Admin): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "Category:Miscellaneous" to "Category:Miscellaneous cases") |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
{{judgment available offline}} | {{judgment available offline}} | ||
[[Category:Miscellaneous]] | [[Category:Miscellaneous cases]] | ||
[[Category:Brief summary]] | [[Category:Brief summary]] | ||
[[Category:Transcript]] | [[Category:Transcript]] | ||
[[Category:2008 cases]] | [[Category:2008 cases]] | ||
Latest revision as of 08:21, 2 May 2021
The GMC fitness to practise panel in suspending Dr Compton for a year had exercised a fair procedure (in light of the doctor's decision not to attend) and were justified in their conclusion (that he had been dishonest in not disclosing previous unsuccessful applications for s12 approval).
External link
Possible Bailii link (not there when checked last night, but might have appeared since)
Transcript from Westlaw, reproduced with permission - link broken for unknown reason
The judgment in this case is available but has not yet been uploaded to MHLO. Contact me if you need to read it.
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: