Re P (2009) COP 9/6/09: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "Category:severance of restrictions" to "Category:LPA cases - severance of restrictions") |
m (Text replacement - "Category:LPA cases - all" to "") |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[Category:LPA cases - severance of restrictions]] | [[Category:LPA cases - severance of restrictions]] | ||
[[Category:Brief summary]] | [[Category:Brief summary]] | ||
[[Category:No transcript]] | [[Category:No transcript]] | ||
[[Category:2009 cases]] | [[Category:2009 cases]] | ||
Latest revision as of 07:59, 2 May 2021
The donor appointed three attorneys to act jointly and severally, and imposed the following restriction: "I require that two attorneys must act at any one time so that no attorney may act alone." On the application of the Public Guardian the court severed the restriction on the ground that it was ineffective as part of an LPA. (OPG summary.)
Note
The summary above is taken from the OPG website. It is listed under the heading "Severance of restrictions incompatible with a joint and several appointment" as "Re P (an order of the Senior Judge made on 9 June 2009)".
External link
No Bailii link (no transcript)
Summary on OPG section of Justice website . This is a link to an archived version of the web page (archived on 6/10/14).
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: