Re Cretney (2011) COP 24/2/11: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "Category:LPA cases - date of birth of attorney missing" to "Category:LPA cases - formalities") |
m (Text replacement - "Category:LPA cases - all" to "") |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
[[Category:LPA cases - formalities]] | [[Category:LPA cases - formalities]] | ||
[[Category:Brief summary]] | [[Category:Brief summary]] | ||
[[Category:No transcript]] | [[Category:No transcript]] | ||
[[Category:2011 cases]] | [[Category:2011 cases]] | ||
Latest revision as of 07:58, 2 May 2021
The donor made an LPA on the "new" form prescribed in 2009 but omitted the attorney's date of birth in Part A. The Public Guardian refused to register on the ground that the instrument differed materially from the prescribed form. On the application of the attorney (who was over 18) the court declared in the exercise of its discretion under paragraph 3(2) of Schedule 1 of the MCA that the instrument was to be treated as if it were in the prescribed form. [OPG summary - LPA case.]
Note
Summary from OPG website.
Title: Re Cretney (an order of the Senior Judge made on 24 February 2011)
Heading: Attorney's date of birth missing
External link
No Bailii link (no transcript)
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: