Re Taylor (2012) MHLO 24 (EPA): Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "Category:EPA cases - all" to "") |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
[[Category:EPA cases - severance of restrictions]] | [[Category:EPA cases - severance of restrictions]] | ||
[[Category:Brief summary]] | [[Category:Brief summary]] | ||
[[Category:No transcript]] | [[Category:No transcript]] | ||
[[Category:2012 cases]] | [[Category:2012 cases]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:31, 1 May 2021
(1) In Re Dunningham: The donor appointed two attorneys, A and B, to act jointly and severally. She then imposed the following restriction: "and the said B shall have no authority to act on my behalf unless the said A has died or is incapable of acting as my Attorney". On the application of the attorneys for severance, the court severed the restriction as being inconsistent with a joint and several appointment. (2) In Re Taylor: on similar facts, the court severed the words 'jointly and severally'. [OPG summaries - EPA cases.]
Related judgments
Note
Summary from OPG section of Justice website.
Case title: Re Taylor (an order of District Judge Eldergill made on 7 December 2011)
Listed under heading: Severance of restrictions incompatible with a joint and several appointment
External link
No Bailii link (no transcript)
Summary on OPG section of Justice website .This is a link to an archived version of the web page (archived on 6/10/14).