Re Johnston (2012) MHLO 130 (EPA): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "Category:EPA cases - all" to "") |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
{{epa-summary-link}} | {{epa-summary-link}} | ||
[[Category:EPA cases - severance of restrictions]] | [[Category:EPA cases - severance of restrictions]] | ||
[[Category:Brief summary]] | [[Category:Brief summary]] | ||
[[Category:No transcript]] | [[Category:No transcript]] | ||
[[Category:2012 cases]] | [[Category:2012 cases]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:31, 1 May 2021
The donor appointed two attorneys to act jointly and severally. The donor included the following restriction: "The property at [address] shall not be disposed of without the agreement of A, B and C, as children of [the donor] in addition to the attorneys." On the attorneys' application the restriction was severed as being ineffective as part of an EPA. [OPG summary - EPA case.]
Note
Summary from OPG section of Justice website.
Case title: Re Johnston (an order of District Judge S E Rogers made on 15 October 2012)
Listed under heading: Severance of restriction fettering attorney’s authority
External link
No Bailii link (no transcript)
Summary on OPG section of Justice website .This is a link to an archived version of the web page (archived on 6/10/14).
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: