Black v MHTS (2011) CSIH 83: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "{{bailii|" to "{{#bailii:") |
m (Text replacement - " [Summary required.]" to "") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'What remedy, if any, is available to a curator ad litem appointed to represent the interests of a patient in proceedings before the Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland, in the event that the Tribunal acts unlawfully or unfairly or exercises its discretion in an unreasonable manner? That is the question which lies at the heart of the present appeal, which was remitted to this court by the Sheriff Principal of Grampian, Highlands and Islands.' | 'What remedy, if any, is available to a curator ad litem appointed to represent the interests of a patient in proceedings before the Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland, in the event that the Tribunal acts unlawfully or unfairly or exercises its discretion in an unreasonable manner? That is the question which lies at the heart of the present appeal, which was remitted to this court by the Sheriff Principal of Grampian, Highlands and Islands.' | ||
==Citations== | ==Citations== | ||
Latest revision as of 19:16, 26 April 2021
'What remedy, if any, is available to a curator ad litem appointed to represent the interests of a patient in proceedings before the Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland, in the event that the Tribunal acts unlawfully or unfairly or exercises its discretion in an unreasonable manner? That is the question which lies at the heart of the present appeal, which was remitted to this court by the Sheriff Principal of Grampian, Highlands and Islands.'
Citations
[2011] ScotCS CSIH_83
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: