Anam v SSHD (2010) EWCA Civ 1140: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - " [Summary required.]" to "") |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This appeal concerns the Secretary of State for the Home Department's powers of detention under paragraph 2(3) of Schedule 3 to the Immigration Act 1971 and the implications of his failure to have regard, when exercising those powers to detain the Appellant, to his own policy as set out in a document entitled "Enforcement Instructions and Guidance". | This appeal concerns the Secretary of State for the Home Department's powers of detention under paragraph 2(3) of Schedule 3 to the Immigration Act 1971 and the implications of his failure to have regard, when exercising those powers to detain the Appellant, to his own policy as set out in a document entitled "Enforcement Instructions and Guidance". | ||
==Related judgments== | ==Related judgments== |
Latest revision as of 19:15, 26 April 2021
This appeal concerns the Secretary of State for the Home Department's powers of detention under paragraph 2(3) of Schedule 3 to the Immigration Act 1971 and the implications of his failure to have regard, when exercising those powers to detain the Appellant, to his own policy as set out in a document entitled "Enforcement Instructions and Guidance".
Related judgments
Anam v SSHD [2010] EWCA Civ 1140
External link
Isabel McArdle, 'Detaining and deporting the mentally ill', UK Human Rights Blog, 26/10/10
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: