R v Osborne (2010) EWCA Crim 547: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "{{stub}} " to "") |
m (Text replacement - "\[http:\/\/www\.bailii\.org\/ew\/cases\/EWCA\/Crim\/(.*)\/(.*)\.html Bailii\]" to "{{#bailii: [$1] EWCA Crim $2}}") |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
[ | {{#bailii: [2010] EWCA Crim 547}} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:19, 25 April 2021
It was neither necessary nor expedient in the interests of justice to admit fresh evidence that the claimant suffered from ADHD: it would not afford any ground for allowing the appeal against conviction on the basis of diminished responsibility.
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: