Varbanov v Bulgaria 31365/96 (2000) ECHR 457: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "{{stub}} " to "") |
m (Text replacement - "\[http:\/\/www\.bailii\.org\/.*\/cases\/(UKSC|ECHR|UKPC|EWCOP|EWFC|UKHL|PBRA)\/(.*)\/(.*)\.html Bailii\]" to "{{#bailii:[$2] $1 $3}}") |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
[ | {{#bailii:[2000] ECHR 457}} | ||
[http://www.1cor.com/1315/?form_1155.replyids=618 Detailed summary on 1COR website] | [http://www.1cor.com/1315/?form_1155.replyids=618 Detailed summary on 1COR website] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:15, 25 April 2021
(1) Violation of Article 5(1): Deprivation of liberty was not justified under Art 5(1)(e) and had no basis in domestic law which, moreover, did not provide the required protection against arbitrariness as it did not require the seeking of a medical opinion. (2) Violation Article 5(3): The applicant could only appeal to prosecutors and so was deprived of his right to have the lawfulness of his detention reviewed by a court.
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: