DN v Switzerland 27154/95 (2001) ECHR 235: Difference between revisions

m (Text replacement - "{{stub}} " to "")
m (Text replacement - "\[http:\/\/www\.bailii\.org\/.*\/cases\/(UKSC|ECHR|UKPC|EWCOP|EWFC|UKHL|PBRA)\/(.*)\/(.*)\.html Bailii\]" to "{{#bailii:[$2] $1 $3}}")
Line 2: Line 2:


==External link==
==External link==
[http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2001/235.html Bailii]
{{#bailii:[2001] ECHR 235}}





Revision as of 11:15, 25 April 2021

The psychiatrist who sat as judge rapporteur on the Administrative Appeals Commission had, before the hearing, concluded that the patient should not be released; the patient had legitimate fears that the doctor had a preconceived opinion and was not acting impartially; this was reinforced because he was sole the psychiatric expert and the only person who had interviewed her; Article 5(4) having been breached, damages and costs were awarded

External link

BAILII