Morley v UK 16084/03 (2002) ECHR 853: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "Category:Ministry of Justice" to "Category:Ministry of Justice cases") |
m (Text replacement - "\[http:\/\/www\.bailii\.org\/.*\/cases\/(UKSC|ECHR|UKPC|EWCOP|EWFC|UKHL|PBRA)\/(.*)\/(.*)\.html Bailii\]" to "{{#bailii:[$2] $1 $3}}") |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
[ | {{#bailii:[2002] ECHR 853}} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:15, 25 April 2021
The applicant had been transferred from hospital back to prison. He argued that his Article 5(4) right to review of his detention had been breached as the transfer had been ordered by the executive rather than a court, and asserted that he was still of unsound mind within Article 5(1)(e). This complaint was rejected (judicial review is sufficient) and his Article 8 complaint also failed.
Related judgments
Morley v UK 16084/03 [2002] ECHR 853 (Article 5 and 8 complaints)
- R (Morley) v Nottinghamshire Health Care NHS Trust [2002] EWCA Civ 1728 (JR of transfer back to prison)
- R (Morley) v Nottinghamshire Health Care NHS Trust [2002] EWCA Civ 1667 (disclosure of documents)
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: