Panteleyenko v Ukraine 11901/02 (2006) ECHR 667: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "{{stub}} " to "") |
m (Text replacement - "\[http:\/\/www\.bailii\.org\/.*\/cases\/(UKSC|ECHR|UKPC|EWCOP|EWFC|UKHL|PBRA)\/(.*)\/(.*)\.html Bailii\]" to "{{#bailii:[$2] $1 $3}}") |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
[ | {{#bailii:[2006] ECHR 667}} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:15, 25 April 2021
A search of the applicant's office, and the disclosure of confidential psychiatric information, was not in accordance with domestic law and therefore violated Article 8; the domestic authorities' refusal to pay compensation on the ground that criminal proceedings had been discontinued on "non-exonerating grounds" contravened the presumption of innocence and violated Article 6(2).
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: