R (Donaldson) v SSHD (2006) EWHC 1107 (Admin): Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "Category:Ministry of Justice" to "Category:Ministry of Justice cases") |
m (Text replacement - "\[http:\/\/www\.bailii\.org\/ew\/cases\/EWHC\/(.*)\/(.*)\/(.*)\.html Bailii\]" to "{{#bailii:[$2] EWHC $3 ($1)}}") |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
[ | {{#bailii:[2006] EWHC 1107 (Admin)}} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:39, 25 April 2021
The Home Office decision to cease considering patients for technical lifer status (unless in exceptional circumstances) was lawful: (1) It was too early to say whether the Home Office's acceptance that there could be "exceptional cases" was meaningless and that the policy was therefore an unlawful fetter on the discretion as to route to discharge; (2) There was no substantive legitimate expectation that the policy would not be changed, that it would be kept open for them, or a legitimate expectation that more would be done in relation to the notification about the change in policy
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: