R (Axon) v SSH (2006) EWHC 37 (Admin): Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "{{stub}} " to "") |
m (Text replacement - "\[http:\/\/www\.bailii\.org\/ew\/cases\/EWHC\/(.*)\/(.*)\/(.*)\.html Bailii\]" to "{{#bailii:[$2] EWHC $3 ($1)}}") |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
[ | {{#bailii:[2006] EWHC 37 (Admin)}} | ||
[http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed1583 FLW] | [http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed1583 FLW] | ||
Revision as of 10:39, 25 April 2021
The 2004 guidance "Best Practice Guidance for Doctors and other Health Professionals on the provision of Advice and Treatment to Young People under 16 on Contraception, Sexual and Reproductive Health" was not unlawful. A medical professional can provide such advice and treatment if: (1) the young person understands all aspects of the advice; (2) the young person cannot be persuaded to have his parents informed; (3) (re contraception/STIs) the young person is very likely to have sexual intercourse; (4) without advice/treatment his physical/mental health is likely to suffer; (5) it is in the young person's best interests.
External links
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: