R (LH) v MHRT (2002) EWHC 1522 (Admin): Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "{{stub}} " to "") |
m (Text replacement - "\[http:\/\/www\.bailii\.org\/ew\/cases\/EWHC\/(.*)\/(.*)\/(.*)\.html Bailii\]" to "{{#bailii:[$2] EWHC $3 ($1)}}") |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
[ | {{#bailii:[2002] EWHC 1522 (Admin)}} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:38, 25 April 2021
(1) There is no need for reasons for not making a recommendation where, as here, there is no contention (or any evidence in support of a contention) justifying a recommendation or the consideration of it. (2) In any event, an extra-statutory recommendation, outside the scope of s72(3), has no legal effect and is not susceptible to judicial review. (3) That s72 does not allow consideration of a hospital's suitability in terms of security or family proximity does not disclose a Convention incompatibility: a lacuna in an Act or a failure to provide an effective remedy for a Convention violation does not mean that the Act is incompatible.
Related cases
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: