Barber v LB Croydon (2010) EWCA Civ 51: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "{{stub}} " to "") |
m (Text replacement - "\[http:\/\/www\.bailii\.org\/ew\/cases\/EWCA\/Civ\/(.*)\/(.*)\.html Bailii\]" to "{{#bailii: [$1] EWCA Civ $2}}") |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
[ | {{#bailii: [2010] EWCA Civ 51}} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:12, 25 April 2021
(1) The council's decision to seek an immediate order for possession, following an assault which was almost certainly linked with the claimant's learning difficulties and a personality disorder, without applying the Council's policy on vulnerable people, was Wednesbury unreasonable. (2) The DDA aspect of the appeal was unsuccessful: the question was not whether he was treated less favourably than a person without his disabilities but whether he should have been treated differently precisely because he has such disabilities and because they were a significant contributory factor to his behaviour that day.
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: