R (Munday) v SSJ (2009) EWHC 3638 (Admin): Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "{{bailii|" to "{{#bailii:") |
m (Text replacement - "Category:Ministry of Justice" to "Category:Ministry of Justice cases") |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[Category:Ministry of Justice]] | [[Category:Ministry of Justice cases]] | ||
[[Category:Brief summary]] | [[Category:Brief summary]] | ||
[[Category:No transcript]] | [[Category:No transcript]] | ||
[[Category:2009 cases]] | [[Category:2009 cases]] |
Revision as of 20:36, 9 April 2021
The MoJ's decision to recall the claimant, although contrary to the RMO's advice, was not Wednesbury unreasonable or otherwise flawed on conventional public law grounds: the disagreement was not on medical grounds but on whether, given the history of arson and recent disengagement, a mere allegation of and arrest for arson was sufficient justification for recall.
External link
Possible Bailii link (not there when checked last night, but might have appeared since)
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: