R (C) v SSHD (2002) EWCA Civ 647: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "Category:Ministry of Justice" to "Category:Ministry of Justice cases") |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
{{caselaw-stub}} | {{caselaw-stub}} | ||
[[Category:Ministry of Justice]] | [[Category:Ministry of Justice cases]] | ||
[[Category:Brief summary]] | [[Category:Brief summary]] | ||
[[Category:Transcript]] | [[Category:Transcript]] | ||
[[Category:2002 cases]] | [[Category:2002 cases]] | ||
Revision as of 20:36, 9 April 2021
HO could not exercise discretion to refer case under s71 after MHRT without good reason; evidence lacking at MHRT hearing was not good reason on the facts; following IH (CA) MHRT remains fully seised of case after a D/C/D; decision to refer quashed. (rough summary)
External links
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: