R (X) v SSJ (2009) EWHC 2465 (Admin): Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "{{stub}} " to "") |
m (Text replacement - "Category:Ministry of Justice" to "Category:Ministry of Justice cases") |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[Category:Ministry of Justice]] | [[Category:Ministry of Justice cases]] | ||
[[Category:Brief summary]] | [[Category:Brief summary]] | ||
[[Category:Transcript]] | [[Category:Transcript]] | ||
[[Category:2009 cases]] | [[Category:2009 cases]] | ||
Revision as of 20:36, 9 April 2021
The Secretary of State had rejected an application for escorted community leave because of the nature of the index offence and the perspective of the victim's family. (1) The decision was quashed because neither the question of risk to others nor the positive benefits to the patient had been considered (irrationality, failure to take into account relevant considerations and considering irrelevant ones). (2) The reasons presented in the summary grounds of defence were patently not the reasons for the decision.
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: