Clift v Slough BC (2010) EWCA Civ 1484: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "{{bailii|" to "{{#bailii:") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Citations== | ==Citations== | ||
Note that the correct citation is [2010] EWCA Civ 1484 and ''not'' [2010] EWCA Civ 1171. | Note that the correct citation is [2010] EWCA Civ 1484 and ''not'' [2010] EWCA Civ 1171 (a version of the judgment had been published with that NCN, which was allocated to another case). | ||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
Revision as of 21:28, 3 May 2020
An email from a local authority stating that Clift was on its violent persons register was published too widely: (1) the disproportionate publication was an unjustified breach of Article 8; (2) the Article 8 breach prevented the local authority from using the qualified privilege defence to defamation.
Citations
Note that the correct citation is [2010] EWCA Civ 1484B and not [2010] EWCA Civ 1171B (a version of the judgment had been published with that NCN, which was allocated to another case).
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: