R (Adegun) v SSHD (2019) EWHC 22 (Admin): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Date=2019/01/10 | |Date=2019/01/10 | ||
|NCN=[2019] EWHC 22 (Admin) | |NCN=[2019] EWHC 22 (Admin) | ||
|Court=High Court | |Court=High Court (Administrative Court) | ||
|Judges=Nicholas Paines | |Judges=Nicholas Paines | ||
|Parties=Adegun, Secretary of State for the Home Department | |Parties=Adegun, Secretary of State for the Home Department |
Latest revision as of 12:55, 20 May 2019
Damages for unlawful immigration detention "There are two bases of challenge to Mr Adegun's detention which, in broad outline, are as follows. ... There is first an issue, which I shall call the "rule 34 issue", as to whether Mr Adegun declined a medical examination pursuant to rule 34 of the Detention Centre Rules when he was taken into detention. ... The second issue I shall call the "paragraph 55.10 issue". It arises because there is evidence, not disputed by the Secretary of State, that Mr Adegun was suffering from a mental health condition which was not recognised by the Home Office until some time after his admission into detention and was not treated with medication until 19 January 2016. ... I therefore propose to award nominal damages in respect of the early period of Mr Adegun's detention and substantial damages in respect of 40 days' detention."
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: