Re Y (Autism - Care Proceedings - Deprivation of Liberty): LB Barking and Dagenham v Mr and Mrs X (2018) EWHC B63: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
"The local authority, represented by Ms Mustafa of counsel, applies for a care order under Section 31 of the Children Act 1989 and for an order declaring that it is lawful for the local authority to deprive Y of his liberty. Y is the child of the First and Second Respondent parents. Mr and Mrs X are represented by Ms Prolingheuer of counsel. Mr and Mrs X oppose the application for a Care Order and DoL and submit he should return home to their care" | {{Case | ||
|Date=2018/04/23 | |||
|NCN=[2018] EWHC B63 | |||
|Court=Family Court | |||
|Judges=Purkiss | |||
|Parties=London Borough of Barking and Dagenham, Mr X, Mrs X, Y | |||
|Sentence=DOL of child | |||
|Summary="The local authority, represented by Ms Mustafa of counsel, applies for a care order under Section 31 of the Children Act 1989 and for an order declaring that it is lawful for the local authority to deprive Y of his liberty. Y is the child of the First and Second Respondent parents. Mr and Mrs X are represented by Ms Prolingheuer of counsel. Mr and Mrs X oppose the application for a Care Order and DoL and submit he should return home to their care" | |||
|Subject=Deprivation of liberty | |||
|News=No | |||
|RSS pubdate=2019/2/23 09:59:39 PM | |||
}} | |||
Revision as of 21:59, 23 February 2019
DOL of child "The local authority, represented by Ms Mustafa of counsel, applies for a care order under Section 31 of the Children Act 1989 and for an order declaring that it is lawful for the local authority to deprive Y of his liberty. Y is the child of the First and Second Respondent parents. Mr and Mrs X are represented by Ms Prolingheuer of counsel. Mr and Mrs X oppose the application for a Care Order and DoL and submit he should return home to their care"
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: