Administration of Justice Act 1969: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Part 2 of the Act deals with 'leapfrog' appeals from the High Court directly to the Supreme Court, skipping out the Court of Appeal: for example, see [[Dunhill v Burgin (2012) EWHC 3163 (QB), (2012) MHLO 115]] in which case a certificate for this was granted by the High Court.
{{Legislation
 
|Subject=Miscellaneous legislation
==External link==
|Type=UK Public General Act
{{act|1969|58}}
|Year=1969
 
|Number=58
[[Category:Miscellaneous legislation]]
|Summary=Part 2 of the Act deals with 'leapfrog' appeals from the High Court directly to the Supreme Court, skipping out the Court of Appeal: for example, see [[Dunhill v Burgin (2012) EWHC 3163 (QB), (2012) MHLO 115]] in which case a certificate for this was granted by the High Court.
}}

Latest revision as of 14:48, 20 January 2019

Part 2 of the Act deals with 'leapfrog' appeals from the High Court directly to the Supreme Court, skipping out the Court of Appeal: for example, see Dunhill v Burgin [2012] EWHC 3163 (QB), [2012] MHLO 115 in which case a certificate for this was granted by the High Court.