Administration of Justice Act 1969: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Part 2 of the Act deals with 'leapfrog' appeals from the High Court directly to the Supreme Court, skipping out the Court of Appeal: for example, see [[Dunhill v Burgin (2012) EWHC 3163 (QB), (2012) MHLO 115]] in which case a certificate for this was granted by the High Court. | {{Legislation | ||
|Subject=Miscellaneous legislation | |||
|Type=UK Public General Act | |||
|Year=1969 | |||
|Number=58 | |||
|Summary=Part 2 of the Act deals with 'leapfrog' appeals from the High Court directly to the Supreme Court, skipping out the Court of Appeal: for example, see [[Dunhill v Burgin (2012) EWHC 3163 (QB), (2012) MHLO 115]] in which case a certificate for this was granted by the High Court. | |||
}} |
Latest revision as of 14:48, 20 January 2019
Part 2 of the Act deals with 'leapfrog' appeals from the High Court directly to the Supreme Court, skipping out the Court of Appeal: for example, see Dunhill v Burgin [2012] EWHC 3163 (QB), [2012] MHLO 115 in which case a certificate for this was granted by the High Court.
Full text: Legislation.gov.uk
Type: UK Public General Act🔍
Year: 1969🔍
Number: 58
Subject: Miscellaneous legislation🔍
What links here:
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: