R v Chowdhury (2011) EWCA Crim 936: Difference between revisions
m (Robot: Removing from Category:Criminal law) |
m (Text replacement - "{{bailii|" to "{{#bailii:") |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
{{bailii | {{#bailii:[2011] EWCA Crim 936|no}} | ||
[[Media:R v Chowdhury (2011) EWCA Crim 936.pdf|Transcript]] | [[Media:R v Chowdhury (2011) EWCA Crim 936.pdf|Transcript]] |
Revision as of 23:44, 30 October 2016
The judge imposed a restriction order (contrary to the medical recommendations) because of the serious nature of the offence and his concerns about previous non-compliance. The Court of Appeal were willing to quash the restriction order if the appellant made the following undertakings: to surrender his Bangladeshi passport; not to apply for another Bangladeshi passport; to surrender his UK passport; not to apply for another UK passport; not to apply for any other travel documents; and to give irrevocable instructions that such documents are not to be returned to him without the written consent of his treating psychiatrist.
External link
Possible Bailii link (not there when checked last night, but might have appeared since)