R v Goucher (2011) EWCA Crim 2473: Difference between revisions
m (Robot: Removing from Category:Criminal law) |
m (Text replacement - "{{bailii|" to "{{#bailii:") |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
{{bailii | {{#bailii:(2011) EWCA Crim 2473|no}} | ||
[[Media:R v Goucher (2011) EWCA Crim 2473.pdf|Transcript]] | [[Media:R v Goucher (2011) EWCA Crim 2473.pdf|Transcript]] | ||
Revision as of 23:42, 30 October 2016
On appeal, the restriction order was quashed: the judge had applied the correct test (whether it was necessary to protect the public from serious harm) but, as confirmed by a psychiatric report prepared for the appeal, he had got the answer wrong. [Summary based on All ER (D) report.]
Related judgments
R v Goucher [2011] EWCA Crim 2473
Other
Date: 20/10/11
Before: Hughes LJ, Cranston and Hickinbottom JJ (judgment delivered extempore)
John Lockhurst (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant.
Henry Hughes (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown.
Citations
R v Groucher (2011) All ER (D) 164 (Oct)
External link
Possible Bailii link (not there when checked last night, but might have appeared since)
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: