Tam v Slovakia 50213/99 (2004) ECHR 282: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "{{stub}} " to "") |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2004/282.html Bailii] | [http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2004/282.html Bailii] | ||
[[Category:ECHR deprivation of liberty cases]] | [[Category:ECHR deprivation of liberty cases]] | ||
Revision as of 21:28, 26 May 2015
(1) Violation of Article 5(1): Detention not in accordance with procedure prescribed by domestic law. (2) Violation of Article 5(4): The review procedure failed to provide adequate guarantees to the applicant; in particular, the court failed to appoint a guardian as required by domestic law, and did not hear the applicant or the doctor treating him with a view to establishing whether the applicant’s deprivation of liberty had been justified.
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: