R (LH) v MHRT (2002) EWHC 1522 (Admin): Difference between revisions
(Adding summary) |
m (Text replacement - "{{stub}} " to "") |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
[http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2002/1522.html Bailii] | [http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2002/1522.html Bailii] | ||
[[Category:Reasons]] | [[Category:Reasons]] |
Revision as of 21:24, 26 May 2015
(1) There is no need for reasons for not making a recommendation where, as here, there is no contention (or any evidence in support of a contention) justifying a recommendation or the consideration of it. (2) In any event, an extra-statutory recommendation, outside the scope of s72(3), has no legal effect and is not susceptible to judicial review. (3) That s72 does not allow consideration of a hospital's suitability in terms of security or family proximity does not disclose a Convention incompatibility: a lacuna in an Act or a failure to provide an effective remedy for a Convention violation does not mean that the Act is incompatible.