R v Charisma (2009) EWCA Crim 2345: Difference between revisions
m (Robot: Removing from Category:Criminal law) |
m (Text replacement - "{{stub}} " to "") |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2009/2345.html Bailii] | [http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2009/2345.html Bailii] | ||
[[Category:Brief summary]] | [[Category:Brief summary]] |
Revision as of 21:23, 26 May 2015
The appellant argued that his mental condition had made it undesirable for him to have given evidence, so no direction under s35 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 (adverse inference from failure to give evidence) should have been given; he was unsuccessful.
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: