Pankiewicz v Poland 34151/04 (2008) ECHR 148: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "{{stub}} " to "") |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2008/148.html Bailii] | [http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2008/148.html Bailii] | ||
[[Category:ECHR deprivation of liberty cases]] | [[Category:ECHR deprivation of liberty cases]] |
Revision as of 21:17, 26 May 2015
It would be too rigid to expect immediate transfer from prison to psychiatric hospital but, although the delay of 2 months 25 days did not at first glance seem particularly excessive, on balance it was not acceptable and violated Article 5(1); the claimant had been compensated by the domestic court so was not a victim for Article 5(3) purposes; the Article 6 complaint was rejected for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: