G v E (2010) EWCA Civ 548: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "{{stub}} " to "") |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2010/548.html Bailii] | [http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2010/548.html Bailii] | ||
[[Category:Deprivation of liberty]] | [[Category:Deprivation of liberty]] | ||
Revision as of 21:06, 26 May 2015
Successful renewed application for permission to appeal: it was arguable that the judge was wrong in deciding that the court may entertain an application for an order under s16 MCA 2005 that would have the effect of depriving a person of his liberty without being satisfied that his condition warrants compulsory confinement. Permission was given on other grounds also.
Related judgments
Manchester City Council v G [2011] EWCA Civ 939
- G v E [2010] EWHC 3385 (Fam) - costs
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: