Gorshkov v Ukraine 67531/01 (2004) ECHR 726: Difference between revisions
(Created page with '''The claimants complaints, relating to his detention in hospital, under Article 2, 3 and 5(1) were manifestly unfounded, but his complaint under Article 5(4) was admissible'...') |
m (Text replacement - "{{stub}} " to "") |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
[http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2004/726.html Bailii] | [http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2004/726.html Bailii] | ||
[[Category:ECHR]] | [[Category:ECHR]] | ||
Revision as of 21:05, 26 May 2015
The claimants complaints, relating to his detention in hospital, under Article 2, 3 and 5(1) were manifestly unfounded, but his complaint under Article 5(4) was admissible
Related judgments
Gorshkov v Ukraine 67531/01 [2005] ECHR 936
- Gorshkov v Ukraine 67531/01 [2004] ECHR 726 (admissibility)
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: