Re Edmonds (2012) MHLO 129 (LPA): Difference between revisions
(Created page with "''The donor appointed a sole attorney and then two replacements, the latter to act jointly for some decisions and jointly and severally for others. She then directed as follow...") |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
[[Category:LPA cases - all]] | [[Category:LPA cases - all]] | ||
[[Category:LPA cases - | [[Category: LPA cases - severence of restrictions incompatible with an appointment to act jointly in some matters and jointly and severally in others]] | ||
[[Category:Brief summary]] | [[Category:Brief summary]] | ||
[[Category:No transcript]] | [[Category:No transcript]] | ||
[[Category:2012 cases]] | [[Category:2012 cases]] | ||
Revision as of 22:15, 18 December 2012
The donor appointed a sole attorney and then two replacements, the latter to act jointly for some decisions and jointly and severally for others. She then directed as follows: "I would like my replacement attorneys to act jointly as much as possible and always where any transaction is valued at more than £5,000." On the application of the Public Guardian the words "as much as possible and always" were severed on the ground that they were uncertain and incompatible with the appointment type. [OPG summary - LPA case.]
Note
Summary from OPG section of Justice website.
Case title: Re Edmonds (an order of the Senior Judge made on 12 November 2012)
Listed under heading: Severance of restrictions incompatible with an appointment to act jointly in some matters and jointly and severally in others
External link
Not on Bailii - no transcript
Summary on OPG section of Justice website . This is a link to an archived version of the web page (archived on 6/10/14).