R v Ukpabio (2007) EWCA Crim 2108: Difference between revisions

m (Robot: Adding category Other criminal law cases)
m (Robot: Removing from Category:Criminal law)
Line 8: Line 8:
{{caselaw-stub}}
{{caselaw-stub}}


[[Category:Criminal law]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2007 cases]]
[[Category:2007 cases]]
[[Category:Other criminal law cases]]
[[Category:Other criminal law cases]]

Revision as of 17:26, 8 January 2012

The Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 provide the complete statutory scheme for providing evidence via video link, and the court had no jurisdiction to direct that a defendant's evidence be given by video link (NB the 1999 Act has since been amended); however, in exceptional circumstances, it might be appropriate for a defendant to participate by video link, but this did not apply in this case and the refusal of video link facilities did not cause any prejudice; the restriction order was appropriate.

External links

Bailii