R v Ukpabio (2007) EWCA Crim 2108: Difference between revisions
m (Robot: Adding category Other criminal law cases) |
m (Robot: Removing from Category:Criminal law) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
{{caselaw-stub}} | {{caselaw-stub}} | ||
[[Category:Brief summary]] | [[Category:Brief summary]] | ||
[[Category:Transcript]] | [[Category:Transcript]] | ||
[[Category:2007 cases]] | [[Category:2007 cases]] | ||
[[Category:Other criminal law cases]] | [[Category:Other criminal law cases]] |
Revision as of 17:26, 8 January 2012
The Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 provide the complete statutory scheme for providing evidence via video link, and the court had no jurisdiction to direct that a defendant's evidence be given by video link (NB the 1999 Act has since been amended); however, in exceptional circumstances, it might be appropriate for a defendant to participate by video link, but this did not apply in this case and the refusal of video link facilities did not cause any prejudice; the restriction order was appropriate.
External links
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: