R v Tabbakh (2009) EWCA Crim 464: Difference between revisions
m (Robot: Adding category Other criminal law cases) |
m (Robot: Removing from Category:Criminal law) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
[[Category:Brief summary]] | [[Category:Brief summary]] | ||
[[Category:Transcript]] | [[Category:Transcript]] | ||
[[Category:2009 cases]] | [[Category:2009 cases]] | ||
[[Category:Other criminal law cases]] | [[Category:Other criminal law cases]] |
Revision as of 17:26, 8 January 2012
The judge was entitled to rule that it was open to the jury to draw adverse inferences from the fact that the appellant had not given evidence, and that the exception in s35(1)(b) Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 (that it appears to the court that the physical or mental condition of the accused makes it undesirable for him to give evidence) did not apply to him even though he suffered from a mental health condition.
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: