R v Shepherd (Jack) (2002) EWCA Crim 1091: Difference between revisions
m (Robot: Adding category Unfitness and insanity cases) |
m (Robot: Removing from Category:Criminal law) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
[[Category:No summary]] | [[Category:No summary]] | ||
[[Category:Transcript]] | [[Category:Transcript]] | ||
[[Category:2002 cases]] | [[Category:2002 cases]] | ||
[[Category:Unfitness and insanity cases]] | [[Category:Unfitness and insanity cases]] | ||
Revision as of 17:26, 8 January 2012
Conviction quashed and substituted with an admission order with restrictions as, had the issue been raised, on the evidence the jury would have found that the defendant was unfit to plead but had done the act.
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: