R v Hurst (2007) EWCA Crim 3436: Difference between revisions
m (Robot: Adding category Restriction order cases) |
m (Robot: Removing from Category:Criminal law) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
[[Category:Brief summary]] | [[Category:Brief summary]] | ||
[[Category:Transcript]] | [[Category:Transcript]] | ||
[[Category:2007 cases]] | [[Category:2007 cases]] | ||
[[Category:Restriction order cases]] | [[Category:Restriction order cases]] | ||
Revision as of 17:23, 8 January 2012
The restriction order was set aside as: (1) there was insufficient evidence that it was necessary for the protection of the public from serious harm; (2) the judge did not explain why he had rejected the medical evidence, which was against the imposition of a restriction order.
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: