Lumba (WL) v SSHD (2011) UKSC 12: Difference between revisions

(Created page with "''(1) It was unlawful in public law for the SSHD to operate an unpublished policy on the detention of foreign national prisoners which differed from the published policy and whic...")
 
Line 5: Line 5:


[[Category:Unlawful detention cases]]
[[Category:Unlawful detention cases]]
[[Category:No summary]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2011 cases]]
[[Category:2011 cases]]

Revision as of 19:09, 30 April 2011

(1) It was unlawful in public law for the SSHD to operate an unpublished policy on the detention of foreign national prisoners which differed from the published policy and which amounted to a near-blanket ban on release. (2) The detention of the appellants was unlawful, even though they would have been detained even on the published policy. (3) As they suffered no loss, the appellants were entitled to nominal damages of one pound (and not 'vindicatory' or exemplary damages).

External link

...